#writerproblems: Tripping On Plot Holes.


Nothing irritates readers and writers alike like a plothole.

Take the film version of Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban. When Lupin and Sirius Black confront Harry, Hermione, and Ron, they talk about the Marauder’s Map and how it never lies. This is how they realize traitor Peter Pettigrew is not only alive, but disguised as Scabbers, Ron’s pet rat.

harry-potter-marauder-s-map_a-G-14088189-0.jpgHow do Lupin and Sirius know about the map? Because they made it. Their nicknames—Mooney and Padfoot—are on the front. The book makes this a neat little reveal.

I doubt whether any Hogwarts students ever found out more about the Hogwarts grounds and Hogsmeade than we did….And that’s how we cam to write the Marauder’s Map, and sign it with our nicknames. Sirius is Padfoot. Peter is wormtail… -Remus Lupin, Chapter 18

The movie completely ignores it.

Without this reveal, movie-goers are left to wonder why on earth Lupin and Sirius know how the map never lies, let alone how it works. There was a special trick to opening it Harry had to learn from the Weasley twins. In this film, there’s no reason given why any adult should understand the map.

Such plotholes infuriate because they can be so easily mended with just a line or two. Just look at that excerpt from the book: three sentences provide all the explanation we need in regards to Lupin and the map.

Madam_Rosmerta_Cornelius_Fudge_Minerva_McGonagallTake another bit of the film version. Thanks to the invisibility cloak, Harry overhears Professor McGonagall talking to Madame Rosmerta, owner of The Three Broomsticks in Hogsmeade, about the murder of Peter Pettigrew by Sirius Black. We get two crucial pieces of information: All they found was Peter’s finger, and that Sirius is Harry’s godfather. This scene only lasts a minute or two. There’s maybe half a dozen lines said. But these lines help provide some major plot points to the story: why Sirius seems to be after Harry, and how evil Sirius (supposedly) is. Without this scene, the audience wouldn’t know of any motivation of any kind for Sirius to act as he does. So why on earth couldn’t they take the time to connect Lupin and Sirius and the map?

To ignore a plothole, any sized plothole, is not only a disservice to the story, but careless, too. Why should readers care about a story when the writer can’t be bothered to care her/himself? Especially when so often these little plotholes can be fixed with just a line or two.

I discovered a similar situation in my own novel, Fallen Princeborn: Stolen. My heroine initially asks a secondary character for her phone to contact a family member. One chapter later, she’s using the alarm on her smart phone. Why on earth is she asking for someone’s phone when she has her own?

It’s a small plothole. I could ignore it. Gosh, I’ve been ignoring that inconsistency in every draft.

13140843But as my favorite author Diana Wynne Jones has said:

You are doing to read [your draft] and admire all the bits you like…but, while you admire, you will come across bits that make you sort of squiggle inside and say, ‘Oh, I suppose that will do.’ That is a sure sign that it won’t do….think hard about these bits, what is wrong with them and how they ought to go to be right.
“Some Hints on Writing”

Lupin only had to say, “The map never lies. I know, because I helped make the map.” Plothole filled. In my case, I’ve only to note the heroine’s phone battery died. Another plothole filled.

When you take your editor’s walk through your draft, don’t just squirm and ignore the plot holes, leaving them for others to trip on later. Don’t be careless. Give your writing the attention it deserves, and every step readers take through your story will be a pleasure.

25 thoughts on “#writerproblems: Tripping On Plot Holes.

  1. Years ago I did a lot of work for a group of cartographers. My contact always said the bottom line in map-making was to never pass on a problem. He also said you might not always recognise a problem, but if you saw it and did nothing, it was a crime to expect someone else to catch it. Same goes for literary potholes.

    Liked by 3 people

    • Ha! But actually that’s a fair point. If a song’s emotions can’t be justified, or the imagery doesn’t ring true with the style/emotion, then I guess that’s the equivalent of a lyric-hole. Or how do you see it as a songwriter? (As a teacher/parent, I often have to sound like I know what I’m talking about without having a clue what I’m talking about.)


  2. I suspect you’ve been reading my mail, Ms Lee. My crimes against literature discovered! In respect of today’s ‘mail’ I think we owe you a massive thank you. I shall revert later, when temptation to open reaches its crescendo.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Excellent advice, Jean, and way to catch your own little hole! The HP movies had their good points but there were too many of those details left out- the details that gave the books their charm, really. And don’t get me started on the newest Star Wars offering…
    My worst I’ve discovered is a leg amputee walking next to my female protagonist in the next scene- whoops! He was thrilled to get his leg back…

    Liked by 1 person

    • LMAO! He’s part amphibian! 😀
      But yes. On the one hand I know that films can’t BE the books on screen. I get that. But when it comes to basic plot, you have to make the threads are sewn the whole way through. How is this not common sense? Gah!

      Liked by 1 person

      • I did.

        Well I should be fair, the acting was top-notch. The train’s beautiful, the cinematography was great.
        But it’s not an “action” story. It’d make a great stage-play: all the clues and tension come in dialogue. They made up a crazy scaffold-sniper scene just to make something happen. Blech.
        The music…well. I’ll be writing about that later. 🙂


  4. Is there a difference between a “plot hole” and “suspension of disbelief”? Both sound pretty similar in some aspects but I feel like there are some contrasts.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Hello! And yes, I do think there are some differences. In my opinion, the biggest difference is that “suspension of disbelief” means we’re willing to accept the craziness so long as it eventually gets explained somehow. Otherwise it should be called “indefinite suspension of disbelief.” 🙂


  5. “PLOTholes,” indeed! That’s a pet peeve I’ve had with some movies. A lot of viewers get all caught up in the action, but writers [who are interested in seeing how the dialogue helps to move the story along] are saying to ourselves “Wait a minute….!”
    Anyway, Happy New Year, Jean Lee!

    Liked by 1 person

    • And a Blessed New Year to you, as well! This problem with plot holes is precisely why I’ve washed my hands of the Star Wars films. I love the original movies, and still do, but the new ones have created such odd plot holes that I just feel like the writers are caring less about the story and more about the visual spectacle and nostalgia homages. Grrr!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s